Barna reports that 1,500 men and women leave vocational ministry each month due to stress, conflict, and/or moral failure. Is it possible that our church governance structures (polity) and leadership styles lend themselves to this travesty?
Is there a better way of leading? Is there a better way to provide governance for the church organization?
While businesses across the globe are urgently reshaping themselves for sustainability, many church congregations continue to operate as they have for decades – clinging to traditions, organizational models, and leadership patterns that no longer reflect the realities of today’s world.In For the Sake of the House, Dr. Raimo heightens our awareness of the organizational dynamics within the church and advances strategies to meet both present and future demands. Drawing from Scripture, organizational theory, and personal experience, he confronts assumptions we often accept without question and perspectives we frequently overlook or ignore.
Rooted in Psalm 122:9 (‘For the sake of the House of the Lord . . .’) and the Songs of Ascent sung by the Israelites as they journeyed up the steps of the temple in Jerusalem, this book weaves together biblical imagery with practical application. Divided into four parts, it examines the church as an organization, defines essential leadership qualities, highlights the power of strategic foresight, and integrates these streams into a global vision with local impact.
This is not a call to abandon biblical truth – it is a call to courageously challenge tradition for the sake of the Gospel. For the Sake of the House will push you to rethink assumptions, reframe leadership, and reposition the church for lasting relevance in a rapidly changing world.
“Wise as serpents, yet harmless as doves” – that is the posture required. For the sake of the house.
Reader responses:
I just finished this book. Like most churchgoers, I’m usually focused on the sermon, some fellowship, and the coffee. This book was a great window into the church as an organization and helped me understand why some churches fail, some grow, and why being a pastor is so difficult.
There’s much to learn and if you have been involved in a church for any length of time, this will help you understand some of what goes on behind the scenes. (Full disclosure: Steve is a personal friend and someone I highly respect. You could say I’m biased, but my bias is a result of knowing him and someone I highly respect. You could say I’m biased, but my bias is a result of knowing him and gaining much respect for him over time).
………………………….
I think Dr. Raimo did a great job of setting up the various models of church organizational structure and leadership. Good historical view, as well as explaining in detail the various structures. I also appreciated the perspective of his that there isn’t one structure that is necessarily better than the others.
I found the book enlightening and would recommend it for anyone interested in church structure, all church and denominational leaders, and anyone involved in starting a church.
Here are some quotes that stood out to me;
“There are a number of organizational models that can be applied to the church. However, flexibility is the key, and error occurs when a static, one-size-fits-all mentality is adopted.”
“As we move further into a future characterized by uncertainty, complexity, ambiguity, and volatility, the church must be willing to accept the challenges common to all types of organizations.”
“The church cannot separate itself from the world to which it is called. Churches that grasp the notion of being missional automatically function as an open, boundaryless system. To them, the idea of breaking down external boundaries comes naturally.”
“Today’s churches that choose to be progressive and relevant look for leaders who understand their role is not a status position of authority but rather process facilitators who interact with others to accomplish common goals and anticipate future opportunities.”
“Vision for the organization is critical for its sustainability. It is also critical when leading through change. Unless a clear, compelling vision is cast, followers will not be inclined to invest their resources of time, talents, and money.”
“We just can’t keep doing church the same way. This may require a radical shift in organizational structure and design, and how we view leadership. We may be required to be the church differently!”

I just finished this book. Like most churchgoers, I’m usually focused on the sermon, some fellowship, and the coffee. This book was a great window into the church as an organization and helped me understand why some churches fail, some grow, and why being a pastor is so difficult.
There’s much to learn and if you have been involved in a church for any length of time, this will help you understand some of what goes on behind the scenes. (Full disclosure: Steve is a personal friend and someone I highly respect. You could say I’m biased, but my bias is a result of knowing him and someone I highly respect. You could say I’m biased, but my bias is a result of knowing him and gaining much respect for him over time)
I think Dr. Raimo did a great job of setting up the various models of church organizational structure and leadership. Good historical view, as well as explaining in detail the various structures. I also appreciated the perspective of his that there isn’t one structure that is necessarily better than the others.
I found the book enlightening and would recommend it for anyone interested in church structure, all church and denominational leaders, and anyone involved in starting a church.
Here are some quotes that stood out to me;
“There are a number of organizational models that can be applied to the church. However, flexibility is the key, and error occurs when a static, one-size-fits-all mentality is adopted.”
“As we move further into a future characterized by uncertainty, complexity, ambiguity, and volatility, the church must be willing to accept the challenges common to all types of organizations.”
“The church cannot separate itself from the world to which it is called. Churches that grasp the notion of being missional automatically function as an open, boundaryless system. To them, the idea of breaking down external boundaries comes naturally.”
“Today’s churches that choose to be progressive and relevant look for leaders who understand their role is not a status position of authority but rather process facilitators who interact with others to accomplish common goals and anticipate future opportunities.”
“Vision for the organization is critical for its sustainability. It is also critical when leading through change. Unless a clear, compelling vision is cast, followers will not be inclined to invest their resources of time, talents, and money.”
“We just can’t keep doing church the same way. This may require a radical shift in organizational structure and design, and how we view leadership. We may be required to be the church differently!”